<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Studies Review &#187; Hegemony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globality-gmu.net/archives/category/hegemony/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globality-gmu.net</link>
	<description>nascent theories,  innovative research, and constructive dialogue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:32:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Global South: A Metaphor, Not an Etymology</title>
		<link>http://www.globality-gmu.net/archives/2271</link>
		<comments>http://www.globality-gmu.net/archives/2271#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoliberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Studies Review Vol. 6 No. 3 Fall 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globality-gmu.net/?p=2271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BY SIBA N. GROVOGUI The term Global South (GS) gained currency at the conclusion of the Cold War. It is not technically a directional designation, or a point due south to a fixed north. It is a symbolic designation of former colonial entities engaged in political projects of decolonization towards the realization of a postcolonial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globality-gmu.net/archives/2271/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sovereignty as an Antidote to Hegemony</title>
		<link>http://www.globality-gmu.net/archives/1047</link>
		<comments>http://www.globality-gmu.net/archives/1047#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hegemony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Studies Review Vol. 2 No. 2 Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globality-gmu.net/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BY OMAR DAHBOUR International relations in the second half of the 20th century has been marked by persistent criticisms of the norm of sovereignty previously considered a key to peaceful relations among states. It was frequently claimed that by accepting sovereignty generally, it became harder to question the legitimacy of aggressor states. Furthermore, territorial states [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globality-gmu.net/archives/1047/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

